There’s considerable confusion today, even among Reformed Christians, about the implications of Reformed theology for human free will and moral responsibility. A large part of the problem is that often those who are well read in historical Reformed theology are not so well read in contemporary philosophy, and vice versa. Paul Manata is an exception and he has done us all a service by writing an excellent primer on the relationship between confessional Reformed theology and contemporary theories of human freedom and responsibility. Check it out and pass it on.
TagsAlvin Plantinga argument for God from logic Arminianism atheism Augustinianism biblical inerrancy biblical inspiration Calvinism Christianity compatibilism Cornelius Van Til Darwinism determinism divine providence evolutionary naturalism free will Greg Welty Incarnation incompatibilism Islam John Frame libertarian free will metaphysics Molinism naturalism open theism paradox philosophical theology postmodernism presuppositionalism problem of evil propositions Reformed epistemology Richard Dawkins sola scriptura TAG The Gospel Coalition theism theistic arguments theistic conceptual realism transcendental argument transgenderism Trinity William Lane Craig worldviews