Death is the theme of the most recent issue of Philosophy Now. Two of the main articles debate whether it would be a good thing for scientists to overcome death. Nick Bostrom’s “The Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant” argues with vigor that death isn’t something we should “gracefully accommodate”. Technology to retard the aging process, and perhaps even to halt and reverse it, may well be within the grasp of this generation, and scientists should make it a priority to pursue such technology. We have “compelling moral reasons to get rid of human senescence.” On the other side, Mary Midgley argues that the promise of endless life is a poisoned chalice: the cost of prolonging our lives would outweigh the benefits.
TagsAlvin Plantinga argument for God from logic Arminianism atheism Augustinianism biblical inerrancy biblical inspiration Calvinism Christianity compatibilism Cornelius Van Til Darwinism determinism divine providence evolutionary naturalism free will Greg Welty Incarnation incompatibilism Islam John Frame libertarian free will metaphysics Molinism naturalism open theism paradox philosophical theology postmodernism presuppositionalism problem of evil propositions Reformed epistemology Richard Dawkins sola scriptura TAG The Gospel Coalition theism theistic arguments theistic conceptual realism transcendental argument transgenderism Trinity William Lane Craig worldviews