Last year I posted an approving review of Nigel Biggar’s In Defence of War. One topic Biggar doesn’t directly address in his book is the ethics of nuclear deterrence. This omission he has now remedied with an excellent article on the moral and practical rationale for nuclear deterrence and the role of the UK in holding nuclear weapons. His argument is particularly important in light of the sweeping electoral victory in Scotland enjoyed by the SNP this week and their stated position on the UK’s Trident programme.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Credible Testimony | Analogical Thoughts on A Quick Note on the Kavanaugh Accusation
- Society of Evangelical Arminians | Brian Abasciano, “A Response to James Anderson on John 3:16” on Brian Abasciano on John 3:16
- James on Bertrand Russell on Pragmatism
- will on Bertrand Russell on Pragmatism
- A Short Reply to Brian Abasciano on John 3:16 – Faithbook Social Network on Brian Abasciano on John 3:16
Top Posts
Archives
Categories
Tags
Alvin Plantinga Andrew McGowan argument for God from logic Arminianism atheism Augustinianism biblical inerrancy biblical inspiration Calvinism Christianity compatibilism Cornelius Van Til Dale Tuggy Darwinism determinism divine foreknowledge divine providence evolution free will Greg Welty Incarnation incompatibilism Islam John Frame libertarian free will Molinism naturalism open theism paradox philosophical theology postmodernism presuppositionalism problem of evil propositions Reformed epistemology Richard Dawkins TAG The Gospel Coalition theism theistic arguments theistic conceptual realism transcendental argument Trinity William Lane Craig worldviewsBlogs I Read
Meta