A Christological Argument Against the Principle of Alternate Possibilities
Many (not all) advocates of libertarian free will endorse the Principle of Alternate Possibilities (PAP):
PAP: S is morally responsible for doing A only if S could have done otherwise.
PAP has come under continual fire ever since Harry Frankfurt’s seminal article in 1969, and many philosophers (including a number of leading libertarians) now accept that PAP is false. Leaving aside the philosophical arguments, however, it seems to me that any orthodox Christian ought to reject PAP on theological grounds.
…
A Christological Argument Against the Principle of Alternate PossibilitiesRead More »
A Christological Argument Against the Principle of Alternate Possibilities Read More »